Posts Tagged ‘neo-con’

The Preamble – From Beyond The Grave

September 15, 2012

What Might They Say?

Preamble to the United States Constitution

Preamble to the United States Constitution (Photo credit: drewgeraets)

By: Gary Hardee

“We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Why this “statement of purpose” is not readily understood is likely the result of many factors, not the least of which are decades of cultural and educational decline, governments running and regulating the school systems, unionized government paid and approved school teachers, and thereby a steady rewriting of history to favor government actions that run counter to the very words of the Preamble!

So, in keeping with today’s words and communications standards I offer this interpretation as if from the founders:

“We, the writers of this Constitution, having deliberated extensively over every issue we think critical for the proper operating of a national government, having just endured a war and struggle for freedom over tyranny, and the earlier problems under the Articles of Confederation, are compelled by this 1st and present Constitutional Convention seeking to accomplish six main goals as noted below. We have combined all our wisdom, knowledge and experience to offer and propose this set of rules and guidelines to achieve them. They are:

1) To form a more perfect union of the states as they relate to each other, in our relations to each other and in our relations to other nations of the world.

2) Establish justice.

3) Insure domestic tranquility and peace – therefore the greatest happiness.

4) Provide for the means of common defense in times of attack or threats.

5) Promote the general welfare of all parties to this Constitution.

6) Secure the blessings of liberty, both now and to those yet unborn.

A stable and enduring government, built and operated for the benefit of her citizens generally, must remain small and restricted. We can think of no better way to accomplish this than to base its powers on the consent of the governed and limiting its activities to only those things that we individually have a natural right to do or more locally, the states.

There is a natural danger in governments, in establishing governments and in operating governments. Their tendency is to grow beyond their proper functions and to become instruments of legal plunder and turn into tyranny. Vigilance, our fellow citizens, is the price of freedom and if you think that you can sit on your laurels, generation after generation, and shirk this duty of vigilance and remain free – you are sadly mistaken!

We have taken great pains to accomplish the six goals above. We’d like to point out that they are all inclusive and considerate of each other, inseparable. For the record, a preamble is a statement of purpose, an overarching goal, an ideal end point and what we hope to accomplish. It does not grant any powers itself, only the body and subsequent amendments that are consistent with it will keep our republic true to its purposes. Let not any amendment be approved that does not conform to these goals or tyranny will be in your futures!

It is vital that you do not allow our words and intent to be misconstrued and distorted. Men will come along, seeking to undo and thwart our best laid restraints. It is the nature of man to live at the expense of others. History has instructed us to build a hardened wall against this nature of man. We have done that in our day to the best of our current abilities but it may not be perfect and as times change, new safeguards may be required through amendment. Be on guard and teach every generation accurate history so as to not fall prey to their ploys and evil designs. Heed our warning that the accumulation and concentration of powers in a single place is the very definition of tyranny.

Consider our time and what we have just endured. From our long struggles with abuses and arbitrary powers we have created and offer to a young nation this Constitution for you to improve at necessary times by amendment. Let no one assume powers not specifically delegated or that run counter to the preamble.

We wish every succeeding generation great wisdom and character in the exercise of its self-interest. Maintain the atmosphere of personal liberties and personal responsibilities which are given to each from Divine Providence, not government.  Jealously guard your liberties or fall victim to the lowest desires of fallen man.”

(posthumously and respectfully submitted to our countrymen ~ the Founders)

Advertisements

Let’s Play the Loop Game Again, Shall We?

September 3, 2012

Join the political “Loop Liberation Movement”!

By: Gary Hardee
July 24, 2012

It is an irrefutable fact that Jimmy Carter filled his administration with members of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission (CFR/TC).  It is they who are responsible for the failings of administrations in which they dominated.  Not understanding this group’s immense influence within administration after administration keeps you right where they want you; ignorant, programmed and obedient.

These organizations and their affiliated front groups are overwhelmingly internationalist in their mindset. They view our US Constitution as the greatest hurdle toward global governance, which they openly tout!

They are decidedly opposed to any of the aims of Presidential candidate Ron Paul. This is the entire reason the Establishment Insiders and their member/surrogates in the media beat him up, black him out and otherwise bash his ideas and proposals even while he, and almost he alone, has been accurate in his future predictions of 9/11 and the bursting of the housing bubble, among others, years ahead of their happening.  Do any Ron Paul detractors, who claim to be “conservatives”, disagree with my assessment of Jimmy Carter and his administration?

However, just as Jimmy complained about the “insiders” while campaigning: “The insiders have had their chance and have not delivered. We need new faces and new ideas.”, so too did Reagan! Wasn’t the outcome of electing Jimmy Carter just more of the same or worse? More CFR/TC members, more domestic regulations, more international sellout, giving away our Panama Canal, communists allowed to ravage central America and I could go on and on. With their members holding the highest positions within Carter’s Cabinet and throughout his administration, should we not hold them accountable or to blame for the outcomes? Did the “insiders” become outsiders or was it all a lie to deceive a gullible public?

Reagan, prior to the New Hampshire primary, condemned the TC by name and took New Hampshire by storm, 50% to Bush’s 23%. George H. W. Bush, was required to resign his CFR Directorship while running against Reagan or while “in public service”.  Bush was the Director of the CFR from 1977-1979 when he resigned.
See:  http://www.cfr.org/about/history/cfr/appendix.html

As just one example of his super-internationalist views; the following is taken from this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_world_order_(politics)
“A pivotal point came with Bush’s September 11, 1990 “Toward a New World Order” speech to a joint session of Congress. This time it was Bush, not Gorbachev, whose idealism was compared to Woodrow Wilson, and to Franklin D. Roosevelt at the creation of the UN.” Please note the date! 9/11/1990! Oddly, 11 years to the day prior to the 9/11/2001 WTC attacks. Now, that could be a coincidence I’ll admit, but it is very strange.

You see, many still yet do not understand or acknowledge who we are fighting against. You are the victim of what in the computing world is called a “repeating loop”, normally requiring “debugging” or correcting.  Every command line inside the loop is performed until it reaches a command to return to the first line and repeats itself over and over.  The interesting thing is that the output of the loop is different each time but only within a range of acceptable values set by the programmers within that loop. Just before the loop repeats, the names of the known “X”s and “Y”s are changed to “A”s and “B”s but the formulas and their outputs are the same.  Many being none-the-wiser are all too content to think that this loop is a wonderful example of our democratic two-party system in action. If so, you have become a captive of the loop!

Activists and supporters of the “liberty movement” are largely familiar with the “loop game” and are attempting to expose and change the command lines of the loop and break the loop all-together in time.  I have dubbed this effort the “Loop Liberation Movement”(LLM).

Education is the only thing that will expose the “loop game” and how the masses are trapped in it. To understand the current command lines and how the loop game is played, you must watch this video. When you have carefully watched it, please return with your comments. But until then, I must hold onto my hope that humans can still muster the character and willingness to learn things that they currently do not know or that they insist on denying at their own peril.

For this presentation in written form, click here: The Insiders!

Please, No More Collectivists!

March 20, 2012

Obama is a collectivist of one variety and rhetoric; Romney is another variety – the same with different rhetoric but essentially a big government Republican; Newt is another collectivist variety and his record and words lately easily prove that; Santorum has voted to raise the debt on your children 5 times yet touts family – again, he too is a collectivist with his one rhetorical set.

But Ron Paul is a different animal all-together! The man is a humble statesman that has no lust for power personally or to “collect” power into government’s “hands”. He has done the only thing an elected official has personal power over and that’s to say “yea” or “nay” on legislation, when he convinced it contains unconstitutional provisions, and clearing that hurdle, if the legislation is good for the “general welfare” of the entire nation. Ron Paul is a man of consistent integrity, seeks and speaks the truth as he knows it to be, acts on those understandings apart from outside “lobbyist” influences, has always spent less  than he has been allocated by Congress to run his office and return every surplus. He has also never voted for a pay increase for Congressional salaries and has NEVER voted to raise the debt ceiling or for passing an unbalanced budget. And FOX and other MSM outlets label him more liberal than Obama? Are you joking? The label “conservative” is given to Santorum? His record is like Obama’s far more than Dr. Paul’s! The list is so incredibly long, all of you would be pissed if I listed them. My friends, we are being lied to every day, long and hard about the facts!

Ron Paul is the man in this race that MUST BE STOPPED by the “Demopublican” Insider-controlled establishment collectivists but they are having a hard time making anything really stick. This is because the people who really look at what I am saying here about Dr. Paul will realize how they are being duped once again into this loosing choice between “Collectivist Candidate “A” and “Collectivist Candidate “B”.

Only time and propaganda jammed down the people’s throats will tell the outcome. If you do not take a stand against the status-quo “collectivist” candidates right now, this year, IN YOUR STATE’S PRIMARY we will continue to be “managed” by Washington and New York. We will still experience a continued loss of our “God-given/Nature-given/At Birth-given” rights to again “own our lives” as free and independent souls and agents.

You must side with liberty, or you will lose it! You must side with protecting private property rights or you will lose your property! You must assume the risks of decisions fully or you will lose your right to make them!

You cannot expect to be a free person yet demand government provided “cradle to grave” security or you will end up forced to work for others as the government fulfills this expectation.

Those who learn nothing from history are doomed to repeat it! Ignorant and free can never be! The essence of liberty is the limitation of government! Government cannot give us anything that it does not first take from someone through force! Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force and like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master! Less government, more individual responsibility and with God’s grace… a better world.

Please, please…. for the sake of humanity, your family, all our futures and all that is good, decent and honorable, read this book – The Law, by Frederic Bastiat and work for the election of Ron Paul as President!

http://c457332.r32.cf2.rackcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/thelaw-2008.pdf

Mike Huckabee Has No Clothes!

May 29, 2011

Written by: Gary Hardee
Link to video: here.

First, let me thank Mike Huckabee for helping to save America by attacking the most honorable man on Capitol Hill! Strange you say? His 35 second response to Jay Leno’s question has done more to gain and fire up Ron Paul supporters than any other comments I have heard lately.

Mike, sounding a little caught off guard, quickly levels the standard litany of derogatory “put-downs” emanating from the collectivist wing of the GOP. Make no mistake about it; there are plenty of collectivists in the Republican Party! Too many, in fact, for the Party to be fully on the side of individual liberty and personal responsibility!

Here’s how it actually went down:

     Jay: “Now tell me about Ron Paul. He’s one of your fellow Republicans.” 
     Mike: “Yea, Ron Paul, I, ya.., he’s actually a libertarian. Ron Paul is not
       really a Republican – ah, he’s a pure libertarian. But if he runs as a
       libertarian nobody hears him but if he runs as a Republican he gets some
       space on the stage and everybody gets to hear that he wants to legalize all
       drugs, uh, that he believes in, ya know, prostitution being legalized and he
       wants to  uh, essentially strip the military of anything (stop), I uh. Ya, Ron
       Paul is an interesting character, I admire him ’cause he’s got the guts to go
       out there and say what he thinks but the best way to describe the Ron Paul
       audience is combination gun show and Grateful Dead concert. That’s the
        Ron Paul audience.”

Now, I know Ron Paul a bit more personally than most people because I was on his 2008 campaign staff, met with him at seven different venues, introduced him twice to local audiences, had lunch with him and heard his conversations in such settings and worked months with those who know him even better.

Referring to Ron as an “interesting character” is meant to be very derogatory and his “separatist” comment about republicans and libertarians means that libertarian ideas and positions have no place in republican thought; in other words – the two have nothing in common. What?! He just slammed every great republican icon of the past and Ronald Reagan especially! Oh, that’s right – the neo-cons have taken over the GOP. I almost forgot! “War now – war forever!” Is this the new acceptable republican position? Who gave him the power to change history and just who IS the real republican?

For Mike to make such disgraceful comments, obviously choosing to focus on the few issues that will likely do Paul the most damage, due to the robust ignorance of Congressman Paul’s fully rational positions, he has unmasked his willingness to serve the political power structure that is crushing our present and controlling our future.

Was he perhaps trying to be cute and “hip” by attacking Paul’s positions? You can easily see that he ran out of talking points and was about to offend the many fine military personnel who support Dr. Paul. Notice how he shifted instead from Ron himself (the question) to his summation of Ron’s “audience” or general constituency. The “guilt by association”/”transfer” technique was promoted for use by U.S. Communists in 1943: “When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them, after suitable build-ups… and use the prestige of anti-Fascist and tolerance organizations to discredit them. In the public mind, constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell.”

I am not calling Mr. Huckabee a communist. Many people use this technique, even without knowing it, for non-politically motivated purposes.

This single attacking outburst will do more to get former Huckabee supporters for Paul than Mike’s simple decision not to enter the race. While Paul supporters are justly upset, perhaps we should be thanking Mike instead.

The video link and exact transcript above will, if spread far and wide until the primary election, increase support for Ron Paul from all gun owners, 2nd Amendment advocates, gun show attendees, rock-n-roll aficionados, concert goers, musicians, civil liberties supporters and clear thinking Christians who ask themselves how Jesus would have answered Jay’s question.

Who is the Republican? Ron Paul fits the mold of earlier republicanism more so than does Mike Huckabee. Ron’s faith in the basic goodness of Americans (more like Reagan) and is clearly much more than Mike’s or Mike would not be continually supporting so many collectivist programs as he does. Eisenhower condemned and warned of the military-industrial complex. Mike says nothing. Undeclared wars continue. Karl Marx supports an income tax. Mike says nothing. EvenLincolnrefused to embrace debt from foreign sources for the Civil War but Mike says little about a full audit of the private Federal Reserve fiat banking system. Mike Huckabee either doesn’t understand these issues or he believes in his own vision of an ideal collectivist managed society where everyone is forced to be, ”good” by law. Does that sound Republican?

Since when has Ronald Reagan been kicked under the bus by “true” Republicans? It was he that held that at the heart of conservatism is libertarianism. One must understand that Huckabee is really a neo-conservative. Neo-conservatism is a collectivist outgrowth based on forced democratic global capitalism at best, rather than true free-market exchanges.

Like the Democratic Party of Thomas Jefferson, the Republican Party today looks and sounds very little the party of Lincoln. Both parties’ accepted icons are neither conservative nor libertarian. They are “people control do-gooder collectivists” with slight differences in rhetoric for purposes of plausible deniability. Only a deeper study of these roots will unmask the trickery being wielded against the uninformed. Truly, Ron Paul is more republican at his core because of his consistent support of the Constitution; an “inconvenient” fact that Mike Huckabee failed to mention in his sound-bite.

Have we arrived at the day when to be considered a Republican one must accept, even defend, the obvious violations of the Constitution? Ron Paul has proclaimed many times that the Republican Party has “lost its way”. If it is brought back to its core philosophy it will be because of the Ron Paul types, not collectivist style con-men. Collectivism is incompatible with a free people.

 – ♦ –


%d bloggers like this: