Posts Tagged ‘law’

Democrat Party “Executioner” Murders Many Innocents, Again!

November 10, 2018

Democrat Party: Helping Murderers Succeed

By: Gary Hardee
Published: November 10, 2018

There was not a single person in attendance at the Borderline Bar & Grill in Thousand Oaks, California that was allowed to legally possess even a concealed carry pistol when the unexpected killer began shooting our fellow citizens.  Even the gunman violated the law by entering a “Gun Free Zone” with his gun.

Just as with every other mass shooting event since local, state and federal gun “control” (read: infringement) laws have been passed, the “law abiding” innocent citizens end up dead!  And rather than placing the blame where it should be, on those who voted for the infringing laws, we are always treated to more and more calls for ever increasing infringements that have done nothing and will do nothing in stopping criminals bent on violence and murder from succeeding with their deranged missions.

“…the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

I can think of no better way to add to the kill count than to use the force of government to disarm any group of people and then advertise to the killers that the government is guaranteeing your success by disarming them in advance!  Can you?

I have far too much love of life than to force people into a position of extreme weakness and then tell a lunatic they are ready to be murdered at the killer’s discretion!  This is exactly what the Democrat Party is championing, has been championing and will continue to champion even while the “setup” for another mass killing is preserved and actually enhanced should they pass even more restrictive laws against self-protection.

What the Democrats have planned for your future is a Police State.  That is the endgame.  It cannot be accomplished in our republic overnight.  It is instinctive in each and every one of us to want to live.  To NOT have our lives end prematurely or unnaturally via any event or mishap that life may deal us.  Accidents do happen. We all know that a long natural and healthy life is not insured to any one of us.  But it is unconscionable that one person has the power to endanger another’s life by forcibly putting them into a defenseless position, that all but guarantees his death.

On behalf of not only the “disarmed twelve”, but the other terrorized and trapped attendees as well, I argue that had the Democrat Party stood with them and honored their inalienable rights to self-defense, the gunman would have likely been killed or disarmed long before twelve innocent and youthful fellow citizens were laid waste to.  I cry out on behalf of all of them!

A person without a gun, a home without a gun and a business without a gun, when known by a criminal, need only obtain a superior weapon to succeed at exercising his will upon his target.  Not only is the logic irrefutable but the countless criminal events we all know about proves it beyond doubt.

Unless you can run faster than the bullet, you are left with only a few options.  Use the gun you are carrying to kill your assailant. Overpower the assailant with brute force or an improvised weapon at a moment of their weakness and vulnerability; a much lower probability of success.  Hide in a bullet proof, and access proof, place until superior forces arrive or the threat leaves.  If you can think of any others, leave your option in the comment section below.

But one reality must never be forgotten!  Those politicians who would use the “force of law” to disarm you are your enemies, not your friends!  They must be held accountable for making you vulnerable and there’s only one political party that has made it their mission to get you killed – and that’s the Democrat Party here in the United States of America.

Words cannot express my extreme sorrow for yet another needless and horrific mass murder.  The needless and senseless high death toll that could have been limited had only one citizen been able to return fire even if he missed!  You NEVER KNOW what the actions of the shooter will be if they feel that someone else has the drop on them and that there may even be others with a weapon aiming at his head.  A shooter, not committed to dying, would likely run or seek cover which would give others time to escape and still others time to draw their weapons and surround the assailant and take them out with minimal loss of life.  All of this WOULD HAVE OCCURRED before the police could have possibly arrived.  The police will never be there in time to save you!  Only your armed fellow citizens stand a chance to mount any useful defense at a time like that.

There is one other person that WILL NEVER be there to protect you… the legislator that disarmed you!

Advertisements

David Hogg’s Collectivist Disinformation Rant!

March 26, 2018

Liberal Ignorance and Myopathy on Display!

By: Gary Hardee

Published: March 26, 2018

Hogg destroys his own argument when he said that he doesn’t want to keep anyone from exercising their Second Amendment rights. How can that be when he doesn’t want to repeal current laws that do “infringe” on it already while at the same time advocate more laws further “infringing” on a person’s right to keep and bear arms?

Just imagine what a field day the communist/collectivist/leftist liberals would have had decades ago when the gun-grabbers first pushed upon us federal laws if the founders and writers of the Bill of Rights had written “rifles” or “flintlocks” or “muskets” or “dry-power arms” instead of just “arms” in the Second Amendment!

Not only has he no grasp or understanding of the purpose(s) of the 2nd Amendment, he actually sides against a person’s essential right to be armed at any and all times.

The successful shooting and murder of the unarmed at MSDHS clearly dramatizes the fact that leftist/communist liberals have been extremely successful in making sitting ducks out of our most vulnerable citizens. Such shooting galleries are specifically created by the very infringements that Hogg claims he is not seeking! Master Hogg! You can’t have it both ways!

Parents! Please, let this be a lesson to you all! Hogg is very symbolic of the product of government school indoctrination supported at home by parents who themselves are products of collectivist indoctrination. Hogg’s parents are radicalized leftist Democrat Party collectivists. They “support” their son’s “leadership” and involvement in this campaign because of his youth and peer associations. Hogg’s “leadership” on “this issue” is deliberately pumped by the establishment/globalist and pro-U.N. agents imbedded not only at the U.N. and prominent globalist think-tanks (tax-exempt of course) but by the hordes of college professors, academicians, the vast majority of government paid teachers and all the equally paid-off or sympathetic media mouthpieces we see on “mainstream media” (MSM).

The victims of this campaign will be expanded to those very participants who “think” they are going to make their lives safer by “passing another set of laws” while only sheepishly admitting that Nikolas Cruz broke many existing laws to do what he succeeded at doing.

The gun-grabbing Insiders intend to convert the United States into just another province of a global oligarchy of morphing tyrannical powers. It is just what the power class does

The Insider power class created the system of “free” government “public” schools and then made it mandatory under penalty of law that you send your offspring to them for their indoctrination and our parents and grandparents didn’t know. They knew nothing about Horace Mann or John Dewey, let alone the likes of James McKeen Cattell, G. Stanley Hall, Charles H. Judd and James Earl Russell.

Many public school teachers today have never even heard of these men or have a clue how they themselves are contributing to our nation’s demise. They are the lab technicians – putting our children in their petri dish full of collectivist fungus – yet they feign shock at the outcomes? Never blaming themselves, they clamor for “more money” for education and vote for candidates who promise more of the private sector’s production to pay for the next cleverly named “program”(you pick it)! They don’t even care how much public debt they place upon their charges (young students) through deficit spending that requires we borrow money the government doesn’t have to still NOT fix the problem! It is absolutely INSANE! (sorry for the caps).

We are in seriously deep doo-doo! Besides voting out every Democrat and leftist on our ballots at every opportunity, we must ourselves file to be on the ballot and make our campaigns an eye-opening educational one! Tell people to turn off the TV and start their own serious education which so readily available on YouTube alone! This war cannot be left to the ego-driven opportunist that wets his finger to see which way the “popular winds” are blowing. WE must change the direction of those winds by becoming much more fully informed!

Yes! Remove your children from public schools. Demand vouchers from your county government for each of your children. YOU can better direct your own children’s education based on your own growing knowledge of our history and the pressing issues we are all facing as a nation. If vouchers are not available, run for the office that can make that happen! You will have substantial support but you must be a good salesman for the cause! Know your subject! The info is out there in spades! Don’t be shy or frightened! The next generation is in OUR hands.

 

Are You a Victim of the Education Con?

March 23, 2018

How A Truth Based Education Is Truly Liberating

By: Gary Hardee
Published: March 22, 2018

I admit it!  My writing style is one of frankness. None of what I write is directed at the reader or anyone specifically.  It’s more like – “if the shoe fits, wear it.” Please, take my remarks “in general” as if I were addressing an audience of diverse composition.

As always, I thank you for reading.

An early business ownership at the age of nineteen gave me experiential knowledge of the business world – upon which I built a broader understanding of history, economics, philosophy and socio-political world views because of their direct ties to and influence upon life in a capitalist society. When it comes to humans and their interactions with the laws their legislatures pass – that we assume are to serve the common good – one cannot pick but from two positions.

One side is freedom and personal responsibility and the other side is regulation, restrictions, controls and ultimately subservience to the “law”.

If it’s a law, then it must be legal and therefore it is assumed to be moral and ethical. Or so we wish them to be.  We are to believe that all laws are good and we must live within them. We are not to doubt or question their moral authority but bow to the will of the majority.  When we were young we were told by our “elders” that “there’s a law against” this or that and “it’s the law!”  If one professes to be Christian or raised with Christian principles, then it follows that things like The Golden Rule are practiced in our lives voluntarily. The requirement for needless laws doesn’t exist since only peaceful, non-violent and moral actions would be experienced.  What’s that old saying? “If men were angels, we wouldn’t need government or laws?” But the literal millions of laws that man has passed cannot be known by each and likely makes lawbreakers out of many peaceful people.

What’s the other famous saying? “When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns!’ Weren’t the citizens of Germany warned they would become criminal lawbreakers if they didn’t turn in their guns after a law was passed making possession illegal? What happened? Millions were murdered by their own government! Democide!  Did we learn that lesson of history? It does not seem that we have!  Is that lesson taught in our government schools?  Umm… no.

I have always related to math. But I have found that those who are not good at it most likely failed to grasp the basic principles of fractions and decimal expressions from the outset. One cannot be good at geometry or algebra without a fixed and solid understanding of the basics of math! Right?  You may have struggled through and even forced yourself to learn enough to pass the required tests.  But you don’t relate and don’t really see the need to relate. Right? As an adult in the working world, you can easily lay to rest that portion of math that you no longer find useful in your daily life.  So do other things we deem unimportant to our survival and advancement.  Being free from “schooling” you tend to hold more firmly that which serves best your immediate survival and prosperity. We tend to become more specialized as we trod career paths.  We actually become quite good at what we focus on!

Like the fundamentals of math, our youth are taught the fundamentals of communism but not told upfront that it is what they are being taught.  Their programming compels them to think, act, speak and support communist / collectivist ideas while strongly objecting to being called a communist. They cannot define communism because they have not studied it under that label. If asked, a high-school graduate could not name a single plank that Karl Marx put on paper for them to read themselves. Not one in a thousand college graduates can name two of them! In a pool of such mass ignorance and biased, deliberate instruction, why do citizens wonder what is happening to our country’s freedoms and her Constitution?

Is it any wonder that high-school graduates think the United States is a “democracy” rather than a republic? They have no clue because they have had but one source for their knowledge. Their indoctrination is confirmed by every network MSM channel, nearly every college professor and by the vast majority of likewise ignorant “wet-finger” politician or con artist.

But to get along and to have many friends in our “networks” that could help us at times along the way we are told never to discuss the twin subjects of… religion and politics. Right?  It’s taboo!  Too controversial!  Too divisive!  We have all heard it and none of us can say we haven’t.  But we are told over and over and over again that we must vote, regardless of our knowledge or our own country’s Constitution.  After all, we are very busy with our lives and our careers and we keep to ourselves, even among our friends, our views on politics. But vote we must!  It is our civic obligation! We are told “our democracy” depends on our vote to function. But who would be so shallow as to suggest that a mass of ignorant and divided people can at the same time choose wisely those who will wield the force of government over us in their passing of “laws”?

Is it unreasonable to suggest that one’s civic duty would include a sound understanding of the very Constitution that our elected officials are sworn to support and defend?  Do we simply trust them?  Should we trust them?  Do they deserve to be trusted?  How will we, in our ignorance, know when they break their sworn Oaths?  Who are the wolves?  Are there wolves?  How do you know? Are we willing sheep?

Even though the great majority say they are supportive of the Constitution they still have not read it even once in their lives from beginning to end!  Are we just too busy to do that much in preparation to our voting? Are we scared?  What are we scared of?  Is it thought of as a waste of time?  Or do we “think” we know what’s in it yet we cannot quote any two of the Bill of Rights?  Why should you be thought of as a wise and informed voting citizen if you have not bothered to read it’s all too readily available text online?  Can’t read?  Won’t read?  How about an audio of it?  Would you then listen seriously to it?

When it comes to philosophy and government, people are clearly not on the same “page”.  Too many have been taught, without their awareness, a system of lies and perversions from an early age. After graduation, some escape their instruction as they grow older and learn real-world truths. But it often takes years to have to finally admit that you were deliberately hoodwinked and sold a bill of goods labeled as an “education”. We have been defrauded!

As voting citizens of one country under one national Constitution, why aren’t we more in agreement with the principles of liberty and self-government? Who is teaching us and what are they teaching us? Do we ask? Not enough it seems! We are forced to attend government schools from the age of 6, and nowadays even earlier. The teachers are government employees and most are NEA Union members. They too are forced to teach from government approved courses that they too begin to believe the more they teach from their materials. We are given “tests” that we must pass to prove we grasp what they are teaching. Good grades are naturally pushed by the school and reinforced by our (more so likely) single-parent at home because they themselves allow the “professionals” to “instruct” our children’s young brains with their approved curricula while too many are busy watching the Kardashians.

It seems we have allowed it!  It was the “law” after all.  Now, we are having hell to pay for our willful compliance.

Will our citizens wake, and through regular self-education, revive their dying freedoms in time?

2012 Factional Divisiveness Prevents US Restoration

May 18, 2016

June 29, 2012

 

If one thinks that the GOP leadership is the problem, the solution it seems, would be to replace them via the only means provided for within the law and their charter! It would require we solve the disconnect that seems to exist: ­ not enough numbers of educated and involved voters in the political process.

While we are all on the same side for smaller federal government, and generally smaller government everywhere, it is very clear that our numbers are both still too small and scattered. Our greatest virtue is our individualism but that also is at the root of our disunity and splintering. Think about the die­hard Libertarians, Christians who’d rather go with the Constitution Party, Independents who often refuse participation altogether, honest progressive types who support Ron Paul but again refuse to “become Republicans” and participate.

It looks to be too late in the game to nominate Dr. Paul in August, we should not abandon him or his advice to affect change within the GOP, not now, not ever!

With the greatest respect to all my brothers and sisters in this movement, each committed to their “jersey”, I offer the conclusion that our own divisions, sourced in petty differences and pride, is at the core of why we haven’t been more effective at winning the necessary primaries or dominating the GOP delegate process and completely taking over the GOP this election cycle. I blame the Libertarians the most, then many Democrats who agree with us on civil liberties and are against war and those “wars” not declared at all. Then you have those darn “independents” who hopelessly remain disengaged from any party. While many Libertarians did switch their registrations to Republican, not enough did! The same thing applies regarding the Dems. Same with the Constitution Party, etc, etc. If you will step back and do some real numbers, those who could have easily followed Dr. Paul’s recommendations early on but didn’t are just as much at fault for our present division. And here we sit arguing among ourselves over “where do we go from here”? Yes, it is frustrating.

The greatest inherent challenge that men of principle have is their ability to rally around a set of core principles, on which we can all agree, and leave the petty issues off the table for the sake of the greater common good. Realizing that war contains little good, opens the debt window wide, kills the youth of our nation, destroys buildings, property and lives of countless innocents and makes enemies out of many of our previous supporters, one would “rationally” expect a mass coalescing,  fleeing our respective affiliations, flooding the GOP with anti­war and anti­-undeclared war folks that the party leaders and platforms would have been completely replaced by virtue of sheer numbers. But that did not happen for reasons I have touched on but will not explain here.

Apart from the shallow minded troublemakers and deliberate shills for collectivism, who insist on petty divisiveness, we have much to be thankful for! Our numbers are growing in all areas and the general population is far more responsive to our message than we might think. There are expanding numbers of blacks that are vocally on our side and breaking from the “Uncle Tom” labels hurled at them. Great strides have been make in taking the GOP back to its traditional views and constitutional stances.

The assessment of our present position regarding the movement as a whole is not altogether a bad one. Progress is being made beyond the choir here. The quite literally hundreds of thousands of liberty minded people around the world active on the internet is having a positive impact. Though our numbers are still too few, our victories under the radar, our forces still too divided and lacking funding… we are gaining on the “rascals”!

That should encourage all of us to continue educating and for all informed voters to participate in the political process. Question: Would I like to see all the aforementioned persons totally abandon their “jersey” for 10 years and flood the GOP with our “troops”?

Yes! But that won’t happen due largely to pride.

Please, No More Collectivists!

March 20, 2012

Obama is a collectivist of one variety and rhetoric; Romney is another variety – the same with different rhetoric but essentially a big government Republican; Newt is another collectivist variety and his record and words lately easily prove that; Santorum has voted to raise the debt on your children 5 times yet touts family – again, he too is a collectivist with his one rhetorical set.

But Ron Paul is a different animal all-together! The man is a humble statesman that has no lust for power personally or to “collect” power into government’s “hands”. He has done the only thing an elected official has personal power over and that’s to say “yea” or “nay” on legislation, when he convinced it contains unconstitutional provisions, and clearing that hurdle, if the legislation is good for the “general welfare” of the entire nation. Ron Paul is a man of consistent integrity, seeks and speaks the truth as he knows it to be, acts on those understandings apart from outside “lobbyist” influences, has always spent less  than he has been allocated by Congress to run his office and return every surplus. He has also never voted for a pay increase for Congressional salaries and has NEVER voted to raise the debt ceiling or for passing an unbalanced budget. And FOX and other MSM outlets label him more liberal than Obama? Are you joking? The label “conservative” is given to Santorum? His record is like Obama’s far more than Dr. Paul’s! The list is so incredibly long, all of you would be pissed if I listed them. My friends, we are being lied to every day, long and hard about the facts!

Ron Paul is the man in this race that MUST BE STOPPED by the “Demopublican” Insider-controlled establishment collectivists but they are having a hard time making anything really stick. This is because the people who really look at what I am saying here about Dr. Paul will realize how they are being duped once again into this loosing choice between “Collectivist Candidate “A” and “Collectivist Candidate “B”.

Only time and propaganda jammed down the people’s throats will tell the outcome. If you do not take a stand against the status-quo “collectivist” candidates right now, this year, IN YOUR STATE’S PRIMARY we will continue to be “managed” by Washington and New York. We will still experience a continued loss of our “God-given/Nature-given/At Birth-given” rights to again “own our lives” as free and independent souls and agents.

You must side with liberty, or you will lose it! You must side with protecting private property rights or you will lose your property! You must assume the risks of decisions fully or you will lose your right to make them!

You cannot expect to be a free person yet demand government provided “cradle to grave” security or you will end up forced to work for others as the government fulfills this expectation.

Those who learn nothing from history are doomed to repeat it! Ignorant and free can never be! The essence of liberty is the limitation of government! Government cannot give us anything that it does not first take from someone through force! Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force and like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master! Less government, more individual responsibility and with God’s grace… a better world.

Please, please…. for the sake of humanity, your family, all our futures and all that is good, decent and honorable, read this book – The Law, by Frederic Bastiat and work for the election of Ron Paul as President!

http://c457332.r32.cf2.rackcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/thelaw-2008.pdf

Occupy Demands… Reflection!

February 10, 2012

By: Gary Hardee
Date: 2/10/2012

While there is much to awaken to  within the entangling web of the GSO enterprises, the best cure is complete transparency into the records. The information will reveal the likely corruption which on the surface seems to be motivating at lease a certain segment of the protests known as the “Occupy – whatever” movement.

History has given us ample evidence to be suspicious of such “spontaneous” protests. Many have proven to have been an orchestrated ploy known as “pressure from above and pressure from below”. Other astute meisters of revolutionary parliamentarianism know it as the Pincer Strategy. The goal of this strategy is to give its backers power that they could not otherwise get.  The desired result is usually some form of new or revised law that ostensibly solves the “crisis”. A crisis usually brought on by the very backers of the protesters or movement. Few have the time or inclination to expose the players in the scheme. Ninety percent of such “spontaneous” activities are not that at all! This pattern can be easily confirmed by looking at the results of earlier orchestrations. Collectivism and the growth of power into the hands of government are the usual results, as I said, ninety percent of the time.

The Occupy demands are all over the board! It is the proverbial glass of fresh milk that has been unsuspectingly poisoned with arsenic. Much of it tastes good but the bad part will kill you.

Most of these demands simply build more laws, more rules, more controls, more costs to the taxpayers, more burdens to pay for their enforcement and thus more collectivism. Any person who – in an almost knee-jerk fashion – calls for another law, agency, commission, study, program, entitlement, subsidy or even a tax break are witting or unwitting participants in the growth of collectivism. Pass another law and government grows. Repeal a law and government shrinks. It’s that simple. But I digress…

“Occupy” seems justly concerned over greed and the over-the-top intimacy between lawmakers and influential non-governmental entities – usually big corporations, decrying the intimate game of back-scratching referred to as “corporatism”.  However, no one should confuse “corporatism” with “capitalism”. They are opposites!

The endgame of corporatism on this scale has no objection to achieving Monopoly Capitalism, the cornering of markets by limiting competition. It is a division of collectivism and is used by certain businesses for the benefit of certain businesses and to the detriment of those that are not part of the game.

Real capitalism on the other hand does not have politicians using force to take money from one person and give it to another. Nor does it seek protection from competition in the market place. It is a free exchange, free choice system governed only by the unfettered choices between one who has something that another that might like to buy.

Is it a perfect system, devoid of inherent shortcomings? Of course not, but it beats tyranny hands down every time! With collectivism comes inevitably corporatism just as the so-called War on Poverty of the ’60s has seen its ranks swell way beyond its purported purpose and goal. These are the inevitable outgrowths of collectivism not capitalism!

But it is the private sector that pays the final bill while competing with those on the other end who spend it.

The Supreme Court made a rightly reasoned ruling some time ago that said essentially, “What the government subsidizes, it has a right to control.” In other words, once our money gets in their hands and they decide to “give it out”, strings will understandably come along with it. So, when we subsidize our government with our money, shouldn’t our strings also be attached? Perhaps we should expect, no demand, transparency and openness? Should we the people ever allow our government to go into closed-door “Executive Session”?

It is we, who pay the price of government through our taxes. It is we that fund government operations and it is  we who control their livelihood, not the other way around. Without our money there can be no corruption in government!

George Washington warned us long ago with these invaluable words: “Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force. And like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master!”

The U.S. Constitution Explained!

December 14, 2011

Part 1

Intro & The Preamble

By Gary Hardee

Why attempt to explain something that changes from day-to-day or year over year? Seems rather difficult and is temporarily correct at best!  When, for instance, does the word “car” mean one thing one year and something else in another. Advancements and improvements are made as knowledge, technology, manufacturing processes and consumer preferences change. But a car is still a car, isn’t it? Let’s try “apple”.  Not the computer but the fruit. It really never changes and cannot be confused with a banana.

The wonderful thing about the US Constitution is that it is fixed and determined. Absolute, firm and precise! At the same time, its authors provided for ways to change it but under a very strict and precise process. This if used wisely, is a good thing too! But it is not arbitrary or random nor subject to interpretations different from its words and intent.

Limits and predictability are things of virtue and reliance; things upon which we need worry little about. We understand and appreciate anything that serves us well. But when someone twists a washing machine into a lawnmower it would be the height of idiocy to expect it to wash our clothes any longer and cannot be viewed as a washing machine.

The Constitution of the United States has a design and a purpose. What is that purpose? It is to promote the general welfare! Do you doubt that? Have you ever asked yourself: What is a Preamble? Here is the definition followed by the Preamble of the US Constitution itself.

Preamble: “1. a preliminary or introductory statement, esp. attached to a statute or constitution setting forth its purpose(s)”.

The Preamble of the U S Constitution

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

There are six goals of the Constitution. Each of the goals are noble and support the best interests of the general welfare of the people of these United States. It is very important to note the word “general” as opposed to “specific” or ‘targeted”.  It would be totally illogical to say you are for the general welfare of a people and at the same time allow for the specific welfare of one over another.

One thing is for sure; government is force. There are two types of force; justified and unjustified. Any use of force, by a government or individual, needs justification to be considered ethical and moral. The only justification in the use of force by government must be in agreement with the Preamble.

  1. To improve upon the Articles of Confederation. (n/a)
  2. Establish Justice
  3. Insure domestic Tranquility
  4. Provide for the Common Defense
  5. Promote the General Welfare
  6. Secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity

As they clearly said; it is for these reasons and purposes that it is ordained and established. Is there any remaining doubt about the founders’ intent? Is it proper to take any clause, statement or paragraph, contained within its text, to mean something that is damaging to these stated goals? Is it not also equally logical to conclude that if we abide and adhere to the specific terms within the Constitution itself, that the goals in the preamble will be best attained?

To allow for necessary changes to expand and enhance these goals the founders included the process and provisions to amend the text.  Is it then proper to adopt amendments that hurt or diminish the goals laid out in the Preamble?

Amendments have come and gone. Old amendments revoked or modified while entire new ones have been added. If the voting citizens understand why it is important to stay true to the Constitution, our elected officials would as well and we would once again reap the Blessings of Liberty.


%d bloggers like this: